Coder Farm, pardeshipura, Indore (2026)

20/05/2026

I kept seeing this question everywhere:

“Do recruiters really spend only a few seconds on your resume?”

At first, I thought it was exaggerated.

Because how can something you spend hours building…
be judged almost instantly?

But after digging deeper into recruiter discussions, hiring manager insights, resume breakdowns, and application behavior…

I realized something important:

👉 Recruiters are not reading resumes first.
They’re scanning for signals.

Why?

Because the system itself forces speed.

Hundreds of applications.
Limited time.
Repeated patterns.
Information overload.

So in those first few seconds, they’re not trying to understand your full story.

They’re trying to answer one question:

“Does this match what I’m looking for?”

And if the answer is not obvious immediately…

You get skipped.

---

That completely changed how I think about resumes.

Most people write resumes to be read carefully.

But recruiters are processing them instantly.

That mismatch is where many candidates lose opportunities.

---

In this video, I break down:

• Why recruiters scan so fast
• What they actually notice first
• Why good candidates still get missed
• How high application volume changed hiring behavior
• Why “good resume” is no longer enough

---

This is not just about resumes.

It’s about understanding the environment resumes now exist in.

And maybe the real shift is this:

👉 It’s no longer only about telling your story…

It’s about making your value obvious immediately.

Would love to hear your thoughts on this.

Do you think the hiring process is becoming too fast for real talent to be properly seen?

👇 Let’s discuss.

16/04/2026

Most people spend hours perfecting their resume.
But what if the real problem is this:
👉 it only gets a few seconds.

That question kept coming up during my research:
Do recruiters really spend only 7 seconds?

At first, I thought it was exaggerated.
But after going through recruiter discussions, hiring manager insights, and resume review breakdowns…

I realized something deeper.
This isn’t about recruiters not caring.
It’s about volume, time pressure, and fast filtering.

When hundreds of applications come in for one role, the first interaction is rarely a full read.
It’s a scan.

A decision made from signals:
• job title
• relevant skills
• years of experience
• immediate relevance

That means your resume is not competing on detail first.
It’s competing on **clarity in seconds.**

This carousel breaks down:
➡️ why those 7 seconds matter
➡️ what recruiters actually look for
➡️ why good candidates still get skipped
➡️ how to make your value obvious faster

Swipe through before your next application.
Because in today’s system…
If your value isn’t obvious immediately, you may never get a second look.

👇 After reading the slides, tell me:

What do you think recruiters notice first?

💾 Save this for your next job application

15/04/2026

Everyone keeps saying “resumes are dead.”

But after digging into it… I don’t think that’s true.

What I found is more interesting 👇

Resumes are still used by almost every company.
But they’re no longer what gets you hired.

We’re in a system where:
– Hundreds of people apply to one role
– AI filters candidates in seconds
– And many profiles start looking the same

So the real problem isn’t the resume…
It’s how the system now works around it.

Recruiters don’t just want to read what you’ve done anymore.
They want to see proof.

That’s why portfolios, real work, and demonstrated skills
are starting to matter more than ever.

So maybe the better question is:
👉 Are resumes dead… or are we relying on them too much?

I’m still exploring this, but curious to hear your thoughts
Have resumes worked for you recently?

14/04/2026

Everyone keeps saying “resumes are dead.”

But after digging into it… I don’t think that’s true.

What I found is more interesting 👇

Resumes are still used by almost every company.
But they’re no longer what gets you hired.

We’re in a system where:
– Hundreds of people apply to one role
– AI filters candidates in seconds
– And many profiles start looking the same

So the real problem isn’t the resume…
It’s how the system now works around it.

Recruiters don’t just want to read what you’ve done anymore.
They want to see proof.

That’s why portfolios, real work, and demonstrated skills
are starting to matter more than ever.

So maybe the better question is:
👉 Are resumes dead… or are we relying on them too much?

I’m still exploring this, but curious to hear your thoughts
Have resumes worked for you recently?

11/12/2025

People don’t ghost because they’re careless.
They ghost when they feel confused, unsafe, or unseen.
Hiring becomes human when clarity becomes the foundation.

05/11/2025

It's a truth rarely spoken in the startup world: Entrepreneurship is lonely. 💔

You're the captain in the storm. You can't be totally honest with investors, nor worry your team. Celebrating wins often feels like everyone's speaking a different language.

I remember after shipping a major release & landing a dream client, I walked home feeling... empty. Not ungrateful, but carrying the weight of every risk, every fire, every doubt, completely alone.

Turns out, I wasn't alone in feeling alone. Data shows 27% of entrepreneurs rate their loneliness at 7.6/10, and 61% say it even hurts decision-making.

My biggest takeaway: ✨ The silence is part of the role, but isolation doesn't have to be your default. ✨ True relief comes from structured support—those "hot seat" moments where founders say, "Me too, you're not broken."

If you're feeling this, you're not a bad founder. You're brave (or crazy!) enough to lead. Your loneliness is evidence you're out front, seeing what only you can see.

It doesn't disappear, but it gets lighter when you step into rooms (even virtual ones) where you don't have to filter the truth. Even one honest "check-in" can bridge the gap.

P.S. Has loneliness ever surprised you, even on your "good days"? Share your experience below – what's helped you turn that silence into connection? 👇

— Dheeraj Khandare. exists so founders don't have to build in isolation. Your reality is valid.

22/10/2025

🚨 Post an AI engineer job on Monday… by Friday the best ones are already gone.

Here’s why:
👉 For every 10 AI jobs in India, there’s only 1 qualified engineer.
👉 Demand is 3x supply.
👉 Salaries? Skyrocketing.

Founders are losing months (and runway) hiring devs who code well but don’t fit the mission. That’s the real cost of treating hiring like a checklist.

The winners? Startups using skill-based + culture-first hiring.
✅ Project-based onboarding
✅ Global talent pools
✅ AI tools that screen both hard + soft skills

Result: Teams that don’t just write code… they push your product forward.

🔥 Imagine hiring faster, building trust, and shipping stronger—while Big Tech is still dangling 2x salaries.

💬 Have you ever hired someone who looked amazing on paper but flopped on product fit? Drop your story 👇

07/10/2025

I got a message from a 19-year-old:

"I know nothing right now, but I will do everything for your company. Please give me a chance."

At first, I thought… should I even respond?

But something clicked. I gave him a shot.

And guess what? He was motivated, hardworking, and completely unstoppable. No fancy degree. No long experience. Just heart, hustle, and hunger.

This taught me something important about hiring and talent:

ATS systems don’t see potential.

Experience isn’t the only skill that matters.

Motivation, curiosity, and grit can change everything.

Sometimes, the best hires are the ones a system would reject.

Have you ever taken a risk on a young or inexperienced talent? How did it go?

25/09/2025

💡 The Founder’s Hiring Equation: Culture + Skills + Attitude > Resume

What if your riskiest startup expense isn’t your product… but the person you just hired? 😬

I’ve been there—sorting through stacks of resumes, hoping the “perfect CV” would save the day. On paper, everything looked great. In reality? Tension in standups, slower product releases, and team morale dipping.

📊 The numbers are brutal: a mis-hire can quietly burn 3x a salary, delay launches by 30%, and hurt team energy.

Here’s what worked for us: Hiring for alignment.

✅ Asking: “Does this dev want to build our kind of startup?”
✅ Focusing on ownership, attitude, and rhythm, not just technical skills.
✅ Sometimes the “not most senior” hire became the team rocket—shipping faster and bringing energy back.

⚡ Founder tip: If you’re spending more time screening resumes than building momentum, it’s time to flip your hiring equation:

Culture + Skills + Attitude > Resume

P.S. Have you ever hired someone who looked perfect on paper but slowed your team down? Share your story below 👇

—
At Coderfarm, we help founders hire developers who don’t just code—they align with your team, mission, and pace. Because in startups, people are your ultimate cheat code to speed, clarity, and momentum.

Coder Farm

20/05/2026

16/04/2026

15/04/2026

14/04/2026

11/12/2025

05/11/2025

22/10/2025

07/10/2025

25/09/2025

Address

Website

Alerts

Shortcuts

Share

Category