08/28/2026
Attorneys — a quick word on AI, and it's not the warning you're expecting.
The real risk isn't that the AI makes mistakes. Everyone knows it does. The risk is what happens in your head when it hands you something polished and confident.
NIST studies this. In its Generative AI Profile, risk 2.7 — Human-AI Configuration — describes how humans over-rely on G*I systems or may unjustifiably perceive G*I content to be of higher quality than that produced by other sources. NIST's term for it is automation bias: excessive deference to automated systems.
It's a well-documented human tendency, not a personal failing. A tool that's right most of the time trains you to stop checking — and that's exactly when it slips in a fabricated case cite or a subtly wrong statement of law, formatted so cleanly it looks verified. NIST notes automation bias can make the AI's other failure modes worse, confabulation among them.
For a lawyer, the fix is simple to state and easy to skip: the fluency of the output is not evidence of its accuracy. You verify AI work the same way you'd verify a new associate's — because your name goes on it, not the tool's.
And to be fair to the technology, NIST names the opposite error too: being so wary of AI you lose its genuine benefits. The goal is calibrated trust, not none.
Guide: briggssocial.com/guide
Or email [email protected]
https://briggssocial.com/guide