02/09/2026
For years the business case for RBQM ran on intuition. Most people agreed it should pay off. Almost nobody could put a number on it.
In part one of a new video series with Applied Clinical Trials, Sylviane de Viron of CluePoints and Abigail Dirks, MS of Tufts CSDD explain why that number has been so hard to produce, and what our peer-reviewed study in Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science did differently.
What they discuss:
→ The timing trap: modeling ROI requires real-world deployment data, but leadership wants the ROI case before anyone has adopted at scale
→ How pairing CluePoints deployment data from 18 oncology trials with Tufts CSDD benchmarks and eNPV modeling closed that gap
→ Why oncology was chosen deliberately as the conservative case
→ What the model left on the table, including reduced rework, data integrity, and inspection readiness, and why that means the true value is likely higher
Watch part one here: https://hubs.ly/Q04wnm_H0
More from the series to come!
In this video interview, Sylviane de Viron of CluePoints and Abigail Dirks of Tufts CSDD explain how combining real-world deployment data with eNPV modeling finally made it possible to put a number on the financial value of RBQM—and why oncology was chosen as a conservative starting point.