02/11/2026
Changing the RDP port is one of the oldest habits in UK infrastructure teams. 3390, 13389, 33890, all picked because they are easy to type into a client. The logs go quiet almost immediately, which feels like a result.
What actually happened is that the bots aimed at 3389 moved on. Service fingerprinting across the full port range still identifies RDP from its protocol negotiation, whatever number it sits behind. The real cost is closer to home: if your monitoring is configured as a port list, the host on 33890 reports clean, never enters triage, and the silence gets read as safety.
Keep the port change if you prefer the quieter logs. Just do not record it as a mitigation. That blind spot, and four others that leave remote access open, are set out here: https://www.darkinvader.io/blog/exposed-rdp-port-monitoring-blind-spots?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social