09/03/2026
You asked the system a question. You got a good answer.
A week later, you asked the same question and got a slightly different one.
That is the moment trust dies, and it is why in-house legal teams have been slow to adopt AI tools that look impressive in a demo. A company's risk baselines are not probabilistic. Payment terms are net 60 unless someone senior says otherwise. Disputes follow a defined procedure. A lawyer needs that applied identically every time, because the lawyer carries the liability and the model does not.
On the latest Talking AI clip, RiskVantage AI co-founder and CTO Emad Khazraee explains the architecture built around that constraint. A deterministic ontology holds the legal reasoning and produces the same answer every time. Language models sit underneath it, handling document understanding and drafting, supervised by the ontology rather than trusted to decide.
Consistency, not capability, was the product requirement all along.
π Link in the comments