What are the opening hours?

Monday 8:30am - 5pm Tuesday 8:30am - 5pm Wednesday 8:30am - 5pm Thursday 8:30am - 5pm Friday 8:30am - 5pm

OCD Tech, 25 Braintree Hill Park Ste 407, Braintree, MA (2026)

04/30/2026

A SaaS company passed their SOC 2 Type I. Celebrated. Then stopped running access reviews, skipped security scans during a busy quarter, and let training records go dark. 😬

Twelve months later, their Type II audit came back with 17 exceptions and a qualified opinion. Enterprise prospects walked.
This is the most common SOC 2 failure story we see, and it has nothing to do with security sophistication. It has everything to do with a fundamental misunderstanding of what Type II actually tests.

Type I confirms your controls are properly designed at a point in time. Type II confirms they operated consistently across the entire audit period. That distinction changes everything about how you need to prepare. 📋

The organizations that fail Type II audits aren't failing because they have bad security. They're failing because they treated compliance as a project with a finish line instead of an operational discipline with no finish line. Access reviews that ran once and stopped. Vendor SOC reports that were never pulled. Documentation that was assembled in a hurry the week before fieldwork.

Auditors are very good at spotting evidence that was collected in a rush. And when they find it, the report reflects it.

We broke down the five patterns that cause the most SOC 2 audit failures, and exactly what to do about each one, in our latest blog.

Has your organization ever received exceptions or a qualified opinion on a SOC 2 report, and what was the root cause?

Link in the comments 👇

04/29/2026

"We only need Level 1" is the sentence we hear right before a contractor realizes they actually need Level 2. 😬

It's one of the most expensive assumptions in defense contracting right now.

The difference between CMMC Level 1 and Level 2 isn't just a matter of more controls. It's a fundamentally different compliance program. Level 1 covers 17 basic practices and allows annual self-assessment. Level 2 requires all 110 NIST SP 800-171 controls and a formal third-party assessment by a certified C3PAO, every three years. 🔒

The determining factor is simple in theory: if your contract involves Controlled Unclassified Information, you need Level 2. If it involves only Federal Contract Information, Level 1 may be sufficient. But in practice, many contractors genuinely don't know which category their data falls into, and that ambiguity is a risk that needs to be resolved before the next contract award, not after.

What makes this especially urgent is the subcontractor question. If your prime handles CUI and you touch any of it in your work for them, Level 2 applies to you regardless of what your subcontract says. Primes are already enforcing this in their supply chains.

Getting the level wrong in either direction is costly. Underestimate it and you lose contract eligibility. Overestimate it and you spend months and dollars on requirements that don't apply.

We broke down exactly how to determine which level applies to your specific contracts in our latest blog.

Has your organization confirmed which CMMC level applies to your DoD work, or is that still an open question?

Link in the comments 👇

04/28/2026

We've reviewed WISPs where the "designated security coordinator" was a role that no longer existed at the company. 👀

The person left. The role was eliminated. Nobody updated the document. And for two years, the organization's entire information security program was technically owned by a ghost.

This is more common than it sounds. Most organizations that have a Written Information Security Program built one during a compliance push, filed it, and never looked at it again. It checks the box on paper. It does nothing in practice.

Here's what regulators actually care about: not whether the document exists, but whether it reflects reality. Is the named coordinator still there? Does the risk assessment match your current systems? Are the vendor contracts it references still active? Is the incident response plan connected to a real capability? 🔍

A WISP that was accurate two years ago and hasn't been touched since is not a compliant WISP. It's a liability dressed up as documentation.

Building one from scratch the right way takes seven steps, starting with a risk assessment and ending with a process for keeping it current. None of it is complicated. All of it requires someone to actually own it.

We laid out the full process in our latest blog, no legal jargon, no filler.

Does your organization have a named person who owns the WISP and can speak to it in an audit, or is it sitting in a folder somewhere?

Link in the comments 👇

04/27/2026

You spent 45 minutes presenting your cybersecurity program to the board. They nodded politely and asked if the coffee was still hot. ☕

It's not that they don't care. It's that the way security programs are communicated was never designed for a boardroom audience.
The SOC for Cybersecurity report changes that.

It's an independently verified, AICPA-developed framework that translates your entire cybersecurity risk management program into language that boards, investors, and audit committees already know how to read and evaluate.

This is different from a SOC 2 report. A SOC 2 answers the question enterprise procurement teams ask: can we trust this vendor with our data? A SOC for Cybersecurity report answers the question your board and investors are asking: does this organization have a mature, well-governed security program that is managing risk effectively across the entire enterprise? 🔍

With SEC regulations now requiring public companies to describe board oversight of cybersecurity risk in annual filings, and with M&A due diligence increasingly including cybersecurity program reviews, the pressure to demonstrate that oversight credibly and independently has never been higher.

A self-assessment doesn't satisfy that bar. An independently verified report from a licensed CPA does.

We broke down exactly what the SOC for Cybersecurity framework is, how it differs from SOC 2, and the four situations where it delivers its highest value in our latest blog.

When your board asks about cybersecurity, are they getting independently verified assurance or a presentation they have to take your word for?

Link in the comments 👇

04/23/2026

The attacker didn't break in. They logged in. 🔑

That's the sentence that describes the majority of the most expensive breaches we see right now. Not a zero-day exploit, not a sophisticated intrusion, just a valid set of credentials being used in a way that caused millions of dollars in damage.

According to IBM's 2025 Cost of a Data Breach Report, malicious insider incidents carry an average breach cost of $4.92 million, higher than the global average. And that's only the malicious category. When you add in negligent employees and compromised accounts, the picture gets significantly larger
Here's the insight most organizations miss: the severity of an insider breach isn't determined by the intent of the person involved. It's determined by the level of access they have. 🚨

A careless employee with access only to their own files causes limited damage. A careless employee with domain admin rights, production database access, and the ability to modify security configurations can cause a breach that takes months to contain.

That's why privileged access management is the foundational control for insider threat mitigation. Not the most glamorous security investment, but consistently the one that determines how bad things get when something goes wrong.

We broke down the most dangerous privileged access patterns, why insider incidents take an average of 287 days to detect, and where to start if your organization doesn't have a PAM program yet in our latest blog.

When did your organization last review who has privileged access to your critical systems?

Link in the comments 👇

04/22/2026

We ask this question in almost every first conversation we have with a new client. "When did you last test your network?" 🤔

The most common answer isn't a date. It's a pause.

That pause is the answer.

Most organizations don't skip network security testing because they think they're secure. They skip it because the output is uncomfortable, a list of things that are wrong, more work, more budget conversations, more remediation projects on an already full backlog. It's easier to assume the network is fine than to confirm it isn't.

The problem is that attackers don't wait for a convenient time. The median dwell time between initial compromise and breach discovery is measured in weeks, sometimes months. By the time most organizations realize something is wrong, an attacker has already had significant time to move, escalate, and reach the data that matters. 🚨

What most IT teams also don't realize is that network security testing isn't one thing. Vulnerability scanning, external pe*******on testing, internal pe*******on testing, wireless security testing, and network architecture reviews all serve different purposes and surface different risks. Running a vulnerability scanner once a quarter and calling it "tested" leaves significant gaps.

We broke down exactly what a complete network security testing program looks like, how often each component should run, and what happens when organizations skip the remediation step in our latest blog.

How long has it been since your organization ran a full network pe*******on test, not just a vulnerability scan?
Link in the comments 👇

04/21/2026

Big news! OCD Tech has joined Compass IT Compliance.

Two firms united by a shared commitment to audit-driven cybersecurity, practical compliance guidance, and real results for clients.

Together, we're bringing expanded services across IT audit, risk assessment, pe*******on testing, vCISO advisory, and more, with the same hands-on approach you've always known.

Same team. Same commitment. More capabilities behind every engagement.

🔗 Learn more: http://ocd-tech.com/blog-posts/ocd-tech-us-operations-compass-it-compliance

04/21/2026

We've seen WISPs that were 40 pages long and completely useless in an audit. And WISPs that were 8 pages and passed with no findings. 📋

The length isn't what matters. What matters is whether the document reflects reality.

The most common reason a WISP fails regulatory scrutiny isn't missing sections or weak controls. It's documentation that doesn't match what the organization actually does. A vendor oversight section that lists providers who were offboarded two years ago.

An incident response plan that references a contact number nobody answers. A risk assessment that was copied from a template and never adapted to the actual environment.

Auditors and regulators don't just read your WISP. They test it. They'll ask your designated security coordinator to walk them through the risk assessment process. They'll request evidence that your vendor reviews actually happened. They'll look for the access review records your policy says you conduct quarterly. 🔍

A WISP that was built for your organization, with accurate controls, real owners, and current documentation, will hold up under that scrutiny. A template that was downloaded and filed will not.

We put together a breakdown of the 7 sections every security program needs, with guidance on what belongs in each one and what auditors will actually ask for, in our latest blog.

When your organization built its WISP, was it customized to your actual environment, or did it start from a template that never quite got updated?

Link in the comments 👇

04/20/2026

A company ran a phishing simulation. An employee clicked the link. The result was posted on the internal leaderboard with their name on it. 😬

That employee never reported a suspicious email again.
This is the failure mode nobody talks about when they discuss social engineering testing. The goal of a simulation is to build a culture where people feel safe reporting mistakes, not to catch people failing. The moment employees feel like the test is a trap, you lose the most important security behavior you were trying to create.

Research backs this up. Studies show that punitive simulation programs actively decrease the likelihood of employees reporting real threats, because fear of embarrassment outweighs the instinct to speak up. 🔒

The difference between a program that works and one that backfires comes down to one thing: what happens in the 30 seconds after someone clicks. Immediate, non-judgmental feedback that explains what they missed and how to catch it next time turns a mistake into a learning moment. Public shaming turns it into a trust problem that takes months to repair.

The best social engineering test programs don't measure who failed. They measure how quickly the organization as a whole is improving, and they reward the employees who report suspicious activity, not punish the ones who don't.

We broke down the full framework for running simulations that strengthen your security culture rather than damage it in our latest blog.

Has your organization run social engineering simulations before, and how did employees respond to them?

Link in the comments 👇

04/16/2026

The enterprise deal was in the final stages. Then the prospect asked one question: "Do you have an incident response plan?" 😬
Silence.

Not because the company didn't care about security. Because nobody had ever built the plan. Security had always been "IT's responsibility," handled reactively, without a documented program behind it.

Here's what we see constantly with fast-growing Boston companies: the business outpaces the security program. You're adding customers, hiring fast, moving to the cloud, and somewhere in the middle of all that, security becomes the thing you'll formalize "next quarter."

Next quarter becomes the moment a deal falls through, an investor flags it in due diligence, or an incident happens with no playbook to follow. 🚨

The good news is that enterprise-grade security doesn't require an enterprise budget or an enterprise-sized team. SSO, MFA, and least-privilege access controls eliminate a massive portion of your attack surface at relatively low cost.

A documented incident response plan costs almost nothing to build. A vCISO engagement gives you executive-level security leadership for a fraction of a full-time hire.

The organizations that navigate their first big enterprise deal, their Series A, or their first security incident well are the ones that built the foundation before they needed it.

We broke down exactly what enterprise-level security looks like for a growing business, and what it actually costs, in our latest blog.

What was the security requirement that first made your organization realize it was time to formalize the program?

Link in the comments 👇

OCD Tech

04/30/2026

04/29/2026

04/28/2026

04/27/2026

04/23/2026

04/22/2026

04/21/2026

04/21/2026

04/20/2026

04/16/2026

Address

Opening Hours

Telephone

Website

Alerts

Contact The Business

Shortcuts

Share

Category

Monday	8:30am - 5pm
Tuesday	8:30am - 5pm
Wednesday	8:30am - 5pm
Thursday	8:30am - 5pm
Friday	8:30am - 5pm