04/29/2026
๐๐ซ๐ข๐ฏ๐๐๐ฒ ๐ฏ๐ฌ. ๐๐ซ๐จ๐ญ๐๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง: ๐๐ก๐ ๐
๐ฅ๐๐ฐ๐ฌ ๐ข๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐๐ซ๐จ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฌ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ญ
AI safety is a critical conversation, but we must be careful not to solve one problem by creating several others.
I am currently opposing the proposed GUARD Act because it takes a blunt, overbroad approach to AI regulation that sacrifices privacy and access for all users. While the intention may be to protect young people, the actual impact would be concerning:
๐๐ซ๐ข๐ฏ๐๐๐ฒ ๐๐ข๐ฌ๐ค๐ฌ: Requiring users to upload government IDs or sensitive data just to access AI tools creates massive security vulnerabilities and undermines online anonymity.
๐๐๐ฎ๐๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐๐ฅ ๐๐๐ซ๐ซ๐ข๐๐ซ๐ฌ: Blocking everyone under 18 removes essential tools that students already rely on for homework help, learning, and productivity.
๐๐ง๐ง๐จ๐ฏ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐๐ก๐ข๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ฌ: Vague rules paired with steep penalties will lead companies to "over-block," limiting features and access even where the law does not clearly require it.
We need AI regulations that address direct harms and promote transparency, rather than mandates that force users to trade their privacy for basic digital access.