VPS.US

VPS.US We are a group of IT professionals with extensive experience in the hosting industry offering VPS

Your website loads in 200ms for you. It loads in 1,400ms for your users in Tokyo.That gap is physics, not performance. L...
05/19/2026

Your website loads in 200ms for you. It loads in 1,400ms for your users in Tokyo.

That gap is physics, not performance. Light in a fiber optic cable takes about 70ms to cross the Pacific one way. Add DNS resolution, TLS handshake, and a couple of server round trips, and a US-hosted site serving Japanese users is fighting geometry every single page load.

At VPSus the pricing doesn't change by location. A KVM VPS in Tokyo costs exactly the same as one in Amsterdam, Atlanta, or any of the other 17 locations. Same specs, same price, same panel, same setup time (under 2 minutes). The one perfect VPS provider everywhere.

https://vps.us/kvm-vps/vps-in-japan/

Slack deletes your message history after 90 days on the free plan.And upgrading to keep it? Slack Pro starts at $8.75 pe...
05/13/2026

Slack deletes your message history after 90 days on the free plan.

And upgrading to keep it? Slack Pro starts at $8.75 per user per month.

The self-hosted alternatives have matured significantly in the last two years here is a breakdown:

Rocket.Chat — The most feature-complete Slack alternative. Channels, threads, file sharing, video calls, screen sharing. Supports federation between instances. Active development, mobile apps that actually work. Runs well on a 2 GB VPS for small teams.

Matrix (Element) — The decentralized option. End-to-end encryption by default. Federated, meaning your server can communicate with any other Matrix server. More technical to set up than Rocket.Chat, but the privacy model is unmatched. Bridges to Slack, Discord, and Telegram so you don't lose connectivity.

Mattermost — The enterprise-oriented choice. Closest to Slack in UI and workflow. Integrates with Jira, GitLab, Jenkins out of the box. Heavier resource requirements (4 GB+ RAM recommended) but the most polished experience for teams coming from Slack.

Zulip — The underrated pick. Topic-based threading that's genuinely better than Slack's model for asynchronous teams. If your team works across time zones and loses context in Slack's linear chat flow, Zulip's threading model is worth trying.

The common thread: unlimited message history. Because your conversations are stored on your server, not held hostage behind a pricing tier.

Full comparison with resource sizing → https://buff.ly/SCeAbHJ

Confluence charges $6.05 per user per month. Notion charges $10.The irony: knowledge base software is one of the simples...
05/11/2026

Confluence charges $6.05 per user per month. Notion charges $10.

The irony: knowledge base software is one of the simplest categories of tools to self-host. It's a web application that stores text. Every modern VPS handles this without breaking a sweat.

Here's what's actually production-ready and worth your time in 2026:

BookStack — The crowd favorite for a reason. Clean interface, organized into shelves → books → chapters → pages. Markdown and WYSIWYG editing. Full-text search. Granular permissions. If you want "Notion but self-hosted and simpler," BookStack is it.

Wiki.js — More technical, more flexible. Built on Node.js with support for multiple storage backends (Git, databases, cloud). Excellent search powered by Elasticsearch. Native diagram support (draw.io, Mermaid). Better for developer teams who want wiki-style documentation with version control baked in.

Outline — The closest thing to Notion you can self-host. Modern UI, real-time collaboration, slash commands, nested documents. Supports Markdown natively. The trade-off: it's heavier to run (needs PostgreSQL + Redis + S3-compatible storage) and the self-hosted setup is more complex than BookStack or Wiki.js.

DokuWiki — The minimalist option. No database required — stores everything as flat files. Been around since 2004. Not pretty, but nearly indestructible. Perfect for teams that want documentation that will still work in 10 years with zero maintenance.

The honest question: is it worth the setup time? If your team has someone who can manage a Docker container and run occasional updates — absolutely. If your team is entirely non-technical and nobody wants to touch a server — the SaaS convenience tax might be worth paying.

Full comparison with setup guides → https://vps.us/blog/free-kb-selfhosting/

You've been paying $30/month for managed WordPress hosting. Your site gets 500 visitors a day.That managed host is givin...
05/07/2026

You've been paying $30/month for managed WordPress hosting. Your site gets 500 visitors a day.

That managed host is giving you a shared server, a control panel, and the peace of mind that someone else handles updates. In exchange, you get limited server access, restricted plugin options, and a bill that increases every year when they "adjust" pricing on renewal.

Here's what nobody tells you about self-hosting a website in 2026: it's significantly easier than it was even two years ago.

The stack that used to require a sysadmin now requires a Sunday afternoon:

Step 1 — Deploy a VPS. Pick a location close to your audience. Choose a plan ($10-20/month covers most sites). You'll have SSH access in under 2 minutes.

Step 2 — Secure the server. Disable password authentication for SSH. Enable a firewall. Turn on automatic security updates. This takes 10 minutes and eliminates 90% of automated attacks.

Step 3 — Install your web server. Caddy is the modern answer here — it handles HTTPS certificates automatically via Let's Encrypt. No more manual certificate management. Install it, point it at your domain, and SSL just works.

Step 4 — Deploy your site. WordPress with Docker Compose is a single YAML file. Static sites are even simpler — just copy your files. If you're running a headless CMS like Ghost, it's one Docker container.

Step 5 — Set up backups. Restic or BorgBackup to an offsite location. Automate it with a cron job. Test a restore once. Done.

Total time: 2-4 hours for someone who's never done it before. Under an hour if you've done it once.

Total cost: $10-20/month. Flat. No "introductory pricing" that doubles on renewal. No per-visitor bandwidth charges. No upsells to unlock features your site needs.

The trade-off is real: you're responsible for your own server. But "responsible" in 2026 means running `apt upgrade` once a month and checking that backups completed. Not managing a data center.

If your managed host just raised prices again, you already have the reason. Here's the how.

See KVM VPS plans → http://vps.us/kvm-vps/

What's currently hosting your website — and what do you pay for it?

Your company's documents live on Google's servers. Or Microsoft's. Or Dropbox's.You probably don't think about that unti...
04/30/2026

Your company's documents live on Google's servers. Or Microsoft's. Or Dropbox's.

You probably don't think about that until something changes. Google Workspace raises prices. Microsoft changes their retention policies. Dropbox decides your plan tier no longer includes the features you depend on. Or a compliance audit asks you to prove exactly where your client files are stored — and "somewhere in the cloud" isn't an acceptable answer.

Document management is one of those services most teams never question. You sign up for Google Drive or SharePoint, upload everything, and forget about it. Until the bill scales with your headcount. Until you need workflows that don't fit the SaaS template. Until a regulated industry requirement forces you to know — not assume — where your data physically lives.

Self-hosted document management systems solve these problems by putting your files back on infrastructure you control.

Here's what's actually production-ready in 2026:

Paperless-ngx — The standout for personal and small-team use. Originally built for scanning and organizing paper documents, it's evolved into a full document management system. OCR, tagging, full-text search, automated classification. Runs in a single Docker container. If your need is "searchable, organized file storage," this is where to start.

OpenDocMan — Lightweight, web-based, focused on access control and versioning. Good for teams that need document check-in/check-out workflows (think: contracts, proposals, SOPs that multiple people edit sequentially).

Alfresco — The enterprise option. If you're replacing SharePoint and need workflow automation, records management, and compliance features at scale, Alfresco handles it. The Community Edition is open-source. The trade-off: it's heavier to run and configure than the lighter tools.

LogicalDOC — Falls between OpenDocMan and Alfresco in complexity. Strong search capabilities, metadata management, and a cleaner UI than most open-source DMS tools. Good middle ground for mid-sized teams.

The honest take: if Google Drive works fine and you don't have compliance requirements, self-hosting your DMS probably isn't worth the overhead. But if your document storage costs keep climbing, or you're in a regulated industry (healthcare, finance, legal), or you simply want to stop trusting a third party with your most sensitive files — there are real alternatives now.

A $20/month VPS runs Paperless-ngx alongside your other self-hosted tools without breaking a sweat.

Full guide with setup considerations → https://vps.us/blog/self-host-dms/

What's your team currently using for document storage — and have you ever considered self-hosting it?

SaaS costs stack up silently.$7 here. $10 there. $3 per user per month for something you forgot you were even paying for...
04/28/2026

SaaS costs stack up silently.

$7 here. $10 there. $3 per user per month for something you forgot you were even paying for. Individually, no single subscription feels expensive. Collectively, you look at your monthly outflow and wonder how you're spending $150+ on software tools that each do one thing.

Someone actually did the math on this recently — what it costs to run 8 common business/productivity apps via SaaS subscriptions versus self-hosting all of them on a single VPS.

The SaaS stack (monthly, single user):
→ GitHub/GitLab: $4-19/month (Gitea replaces this — $0)
→ Slack: $8.75/month (RocketChat — $0)
→ Google Drive/Dropbox: $7-12/month (Nextcloud — $0)
→ NordVPN/ExpressVPN: $5-13/month (WireGuard — $0)
→ LastPass/1Password: $3-5/month (Vaultwarden — $0)
→ Notion/Confluence: $8-10/month (BookStack — $0)
→ Google Analytics: "free" but you're the product (Matomo — $0, and you own the data)
→ Server management panel: $5-15/month (Webmin — $0)

Total SaaS: $49-97/month per user. For a 3-person team, easily $150-290/month.

The self-hosted stack:
→ VPS (KVM2): $20/month — 2 vCores, 2 GB RAM, 25 GB NVMe, 1 Gbps unmetered
→ All 8 applications: $0 licensing
→ SSL certificates: $0 (Let's Encrypt)
→ Docker + Docker Compose: $0

Total self-hosted: $20/month. Flat. Regardless of team size.

Annual savings: $348-924/year for a solo user. $1,560-3,240/year for a 3-person team.

The "but my time isn't free" counterargument is fair. Initial setup takes a weekend — maybe 6-10 hours if you're methodical. After that, maintenance is roughly 1-2 hours/month: applying updates, checking backups, occasionally restarting a container.

At even a conservative $50/hour rate, that's $100/month in maintenance time. You're still saving $50-190/month on a 3-person team. And after the first year, maintenance drops because you've already solved most of the edge cases.

The numbers only get better with scale. SaaS tools charge per user. Self-hosted tools charge per server. Adding a 4th, 5th, or 10th team member to your self-hosted Rocket.Chat or Nextcloud costs $0 extra. Adding them to Slack and Google Workspace costs $16-22/month each.

There's a reason "death by a thousand subscriptions" keeps showing up in every self-hosting thread. It's not that any single SaaS tool is overpriced. It's that the cumulative cost of running a modern business or project on SaaS tools is quietly absurd.

KVM2 — $20/month, everything you need to run all 8 → https://vps.us/kvm-vps/

How many SaaS subscriptions are you currently paying for? Have you ever added them all up?

Your VPN provider can see everything you're trying to hide from your ISP.That's the trade-off nobody mentions when you s...
04/24/2026

Your VPN provider can see everything you're trying to hide from your ISP.

That's the trade-off nobody mentions when you sign up for a commercial VPN. You've moved your trust from one party (your ISP) to another party (a company whose privacy policy you haven't read, in a jurisdiction you didn't choose).

Running your own VPN flips this completely.

With a self-hosted VPN:
→ You control what gets logged — or whether anything gets logged at all
→ Your traffic runs through infrastructure you own
→ No monthly subscription fees beyond the server you're already running
→ WireGuard benchmarks show 35% higher throughput than leading commercial providers

The tools available in 2026 make self-hosting a VPN easier than it sounds:

WireGuard — Fastest setup, smallest codebase, kernel-level performance. The new standard for anyone who wants raw speed and simplicity. Most people have this running in under an hour.

OpenVPN — The battle-tested option. More configuration overhead but works everywhere and has decades of production use behind it.

Algo VPN — One-command deployment via Ansible. You run a script, you get a working VPN. Designed for exactly this use case.

Outline VPN — Has a GUI. No command line required. Good option if the terminal makes you nervous.

TL;DR Takeaway: self-hosted VPNs are excellent for secure remote access and privacy from your ISP. They're not the same as commercial anonymity services — you still have a server IP that can be traced back to your account. For pure anonymity, commercial VPNs with rotating global IPs do offer something a single VPS can't.

But if your goal is privacy, control, and cost efficiency; a VPS running WireGuard costs less than most VPN subscriptions. And you know exactly what it does with your data.

Full setup guide + tool comparison → https://buff.ly/TCg9GeQ

Over 51% of all internet traffic in 2026 is automated.If you run a public-facing server, more than half of what's hittin...
04/23/2026

Over 51% of all internet traffic in 2026 is automated.

If you run a public-facing server, more than half of what's hitting it right now isn't a person.
It's bots probing for open SSH, stuffing credentials, scanning for unpatched software.
We broke down what's actually out there:
– Which botnets are active right now
– How they get in
– The practical steps that stop them

Our 2026 State of Botnets Report:
🔗 https://buff.ly/y9X2D88

ChatGPT just updated its terms of service. Again.If you use AI for client work, business strategy, code, or anything you...
04/22/2026

ChatGPT just updated its terms of service. Again.

If you use AI for client work, business strategy, code, or anything you'd rather keep private — your prompts are sitting on someone else's server, subject to terms you didn't negotiate and can't audit.

There's a practical alternative.

The self-hosted AI stack in this carousel isn't a hobbyist experiment anymore. In 2026, Llama 3, Mistral, and Phi-3 run well on modest hardware. Open WebUI gives you a proper ChatGPT-style interface. n8n connects everything to your existing tools.

What you get:
→ All AI inference happens on your server
→ No usage limits, no per-token pricing surprises
→ Your prompts never leave your infrastructure
→ One flat monthly cost regardless of how much you use it

What you give up:
→ Access to GPT-4 / Claude-level frontier models — open-source models are genuinely excellent for most business tasks, but not identical to the closed-source leaders
→ Some convenience — this takes a VPS and a couple hours of setup

Is it worth it? Depends on your use case. For summarization, drafting, classification, and research assistance — open-source models on a $20 VPS are good enough for most teams today.

And the data never leaves your control.

Full setup → https://vps.us/kvm-vps/

💾 Data loss isn't an "if" — it's a "when."Hardware fails. Humans make mistakes. Ransomware attacks don't discriminate. T...
04/17/2026

💾 Data loss isn't an "if" — it's a "when."

Hardware fails. Humans make mistakes. Ransomware attacks don't discriminate. The question is whether you'll have a backup when it happens.

Cloud backup services want $5-15/month per machine, with storage fees on top. Self-hosted backup software gives you the same protection — on infrastructure you control, at a fraction of the cost.

We wrote a comprehensive guide on self-hosted backup tools:

✅ Restic — Simple, secure, encrypted by default. Works with any storage backend.
✅ BorgBackup — Deduplication king. Incredible storage efficiency for Linux environments.
✅ Duplicati — User-friendly GUI. Great for less technical users who need reliability.
✅ UrBackup — Client-server model. Perfect for backing up multiple machines centrally.
✅ Bacula — Enterprise-grade. Complex setup, massive scalability.

The guide covers:
• Full vs incremental vs differential backups (and when to use each)
• Encryption, deduplication, and compression essentials
• The 3-2-1 backup rule explained
• Server sizing and infrastructure planning
• Hybrid strategies: local + off-site redundancy

Key insight: A backup that hasn't been tested is a hope, not a backup. Build restore testing into your workflow.

📖 Full guide → https://vps.us/blog/self-hosted-backup/

Address

159 Main Street , STE 100
Nashua, IA
NH-03060

Telephone

+18009887986

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when VPS.US posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to VPS.US:

Share