10/30/2026
We have all seen it. A nice, polished infographic. A confident explanation. But...a completely wrong testing concept.
Welcome to the world of “AI slop.”
In this episode of The Value of Testing, Greg Paskal joins me to discuss AI-generated content creeping into our profession—especially those attractive graphics on LinkedIn that don’t hold up under scrutiny.
When inaccurate content gets shared as professional guidance, it can shape how people understand and perform testing. Looking credible and being credible are two very different things.
We discuss why human review, practical experience, and professional judgment matter when creating—and consuming—AI-generated content.
And, of course, AI-generated content can contain mistakes. What we are talking about is the increasing practice of prompt, generate, publish - without any curation or review. I'll even share a funny example of a podcast graphic I generated that looked nice but was obviously wrong.
As testers, we question claims and look for evidence. That habit needs to extend to our LinkedIn feeds, too.
Watch the conversation: https://youtu.be/9CcAyC51USI
What testing misconceptions have you spotted in AI-generated posts?
AI slop in software testing can erode the quality of your work. Lea...