11/13/2020
A poster asked us last evening (Nov 12) a fair question: Just curious how a member of your team can ascertain there is disinformation and misinformation about potential glitches within Dominion’s voting technolgy all because they aren’t aware? This sounds hypocritical. Is it misinformation if I said that I went to work today all because Edward Perez isn’t aware if I went?
ANSWER
Hi Jay- Thanks for your fair question. Our Institute, some 70 people strong with a dozen election technology experts (i.e., more than 15 years experience) are deeply versed in the technology of the three voting systems vendors. Add in another approximately dozen professionals with extensive election administration experience (i.e., processes, procedures, policies), and finally an 8 person legal team knowledgeable of election law. Our work includes understanding state-by-state the practices, processes, and technology of election administration. We are very familiar with Dominion technology and in fact, have contributed subject matter expertise to litigation in Georgia over this machinery. So, when Eddie, who is one of our top election technology experts (having spent over 15 years at one of the 3 vendors) asserts that allegations and claims being raised about Dominion and potential "glitches" on a scaled basis are unlikely, honestly, Jay, he is in a really good position to have firsthand knowledge. That noted, let us add some additional points out of intellectual honesty. 1) Glitches are real; they happen. Like with any device, as you well know, errors, bugs, and malfunctions occur. And on a national scale with Dominion equipment in service in 29 states, the potential for what *appears* to be widespread issues may be true on the one hand, but on the other (and this is the key) to assert that they are part of a coordinated, intentional, or contrived set of events is near folly, and here's why. 2) In order to ascertain something like that really happened would require a digital forensic analysis of the equipment -- that certainly can happen, but it absolutely did not in this case because to stage that kind of wide scale "audit" of machinery would require coordination and efforts that would have been very public, and because we have individuals on our team working with the national security apparatus, we can assure you, we would've known about such an effort. So that is how we (in this case Eddie) can make the assertions he did. Thank you for your inquiry Jay! Stay safe.