12/10/2023
Is $60,000 a year a livable wage?
This was a conversation that took place outside of a local downtown business hotel. The conclusion was that $60,000 per year was a “survivable wage”, not a livable one.
agrees that $60,000 per year is not a livable wage.
Since wage is vital for housing and housing extremely important for a stable wage, let's take a more in-depth look at this question.
To explore this topic, let's look at the MIT Living Wage Calculator. As will be launching in Oregon, we will use this state as our leading example.
For a single adult with no kids, just over $40,000 per year will do it. That is the only example of where one can truly live and thrive on less than $60,000 per year.
If you have two adults with both working, each individual only needs to make just north of $30,000 per year. However, the household as a whole must make over $62,000 per year to live outside of poverty and adequately cover all expenses.
Now, if you add even one kid to the equation, suddenly the Oregon minimum wage of $13.50 per hour ($28,000 per year) is just barely above what is considered a “poverty wage”.
Now let's look at one working adult with the other staying at home with the kids (not working). This is a common arrangement given the extraordinarily high cost of childcare. The working adult would need to make over $88,000 per year for a livable wage.
It should be pointed out that MIT is considering a “livable wage” as the ability to adequately support one's self and family. It doesn't necessarily account for discretionary fun and entertainment expenses that most would consider important to thrive. However, there is an “other” category that may capture some of this.
Other states such as New York and California will be examined in future posts for comparison.