https://www.facebook.com/936126152913368/

MOB Revelation, The Silverado, Silverado, CA (2026)

03/17/2026

Unmasking the Epstein Files: Why Isn't Justice Being Served?

is our democratic institutions and how corrupt they are. And I want every single person inside of the Epstein files, including the innocent people, including you, including Elon, including everyone, to be investigated to the full force of the law because it is not down to them to admit wrongdoing. That is why we have a rule of law. Criminals do not admit they did things wrong. They go to court and they prove they did nothing wrong. And what I am saying is that the British state has plenty of time. They have plenty of time to arrest people for tweets. They have plenty of time to arrest people for nothing. So they should be investigating this huge pile of evidence. And the real questions of these, why did they ignore the pile of evidence for a decade? One. Two. Who paid Jeffrey Epstein and made him so rich? Three. What were they paying him for? What decisions have taken place that have affected the lives of British people based on the back of bribe money paid to pedophiles as opposed to the will of the electorate? What laws need to be undone? Andrew, Andrew.

02/23/2026

The Shocking Secret of the Alpha Draconians Beneath Us

Andromedans tell you that the Alpha Draconians
are here now. Where?

There are 1,833 of them that have been living underground between 100 and 200 miles beneath the surface. They've been here, some of them have been here a long, long time. They have lifespans that are thousands of years. They're carnivorous. They are not friendly to mankind, at least the ones that are here. Are you saying carnivorous, they eat humans? Yes. And they won't eat a dead human. It has to be alive at the time of the killing. Their preference is children. And we've been told, you shouldn't talk about that. Other people say, well, you better not talk about the reptilians. Well,
[00:44]
you know, bull. Why not? According to the Andromedans, they're responsible for 31,712 children disappearing in the last 25 years from the United States. These children were food. And I'm supposed to just shut up and not say anything about it? Because people don't want to hear it? That's tough. That's tough. You know, Westchester County, in the last five years, 3,000 children in Westchester County, New York, have vanished without a trace. Where are they going? Why are we allowing this to happen? And why should people stay in denial about it? Now, how are they able to do this? How are they able to do it? How are they able to come up out of this from underground They're tunneling systems everywhere. They're being helped by the grays, and also there are groups within the higher echelon that are actually helping them acquire this. So human beings are abducting the kids and giving them... That's part of the deal. They won't come up as long as we feed them down there.

゚viralシfypシ゚viralシalシ゚viralシfypシ゚viralシ゚viralシfypシ゚viralシalシfollowers

02/19/2026

Si believe this lie that they've sold their soul to the devil. And I mean, it's one of the biggest lies that Satan tells people because your soul belongs to God.
You've said you spent 20 years working for the devil. What does that
actually mean?
For the most of that 20
years, I wasn't even aware that I was working for the devil.
I thought I was actually helping people. This is the thing that I think a lot of people
don't understand. Wow.
Is Satanism just a
misunderstood belief system or something far more dangerous? We
are being observed by the
enemy and by demons constantly.
What we have to understand is when you are negotiating with demons, you have to bring a currency
to do that. So blood has a currency in the spirit world. The blood of animals, the blood of Humans, obviously, the
more pure the soul is, the higher the currency of that blood.
Today, former satanic church leader
Rian Swigelar gives us a rare look inside his
former
world and how, in the middle
of an occult ritual, everything changed. I was down on the
floor,
and I lit the second candle.
And the next
moment, this whole room filled up
with light. I stood up, and
I turned around, and there was this
man standing there. And
he said to me, I'm Ishwar. of Nazareth. And in
that moment,
there's going to be no choice
for me but to follow Jesus.
Reon
Swigelar, brother, welcome to Maybe God. Thank you. It's such an honor to be here. Thank you for the invite. Well, thank you for making the time all the way from South Africa. I've been wanting to talk with you for some time. Your story is incredible. We're going to get into it. First, I just want to name the reality that we were discussing before we even started rolling, which is the
inherent risk involved in talking about the topics we're going to be talking about. For everybody watching and listening, we're going to get into some pretty deep and dark spiritual topics today. That's just part of your story. Whenever we've broached these topics in the past, me and my team just consistently seem to find ourselves in the enemy's crosshairs. in the time leading up to it and the time following it. And, um, we didn't really, we thought it was coincidence at first cause we were naive and it's just, it's beyond coincidence. And, um, we're before we started rolling, you led us in a prayer for everybody involved and for everybody listening and watching our conversation, because, you know, as well as we do the inherent implied risks involved in this, uh, sort of topic. So tell us why specifically why prayer is important when getting into something like we're getting into today.
Absolutely. So I think people, and especially Christians, underestimate the power of prayer completely because, firstly, it's
so available, and
people think, people take it for granted.

゚viralシfypシ゚viralシalシ゚viralシfypシ゚viralシ゚viralシfypシ゚viralシalシfollowers

02/19/2026

name is Philip Buchholz. I have a PhD in biochemistry and molecular biology. I'm a cancer gene jock. Basically, I do cancer genomics research at the University of South Carolina. What that means is that I'm kind of an expert on all the ways that the human genome can get fussed with during your lifetime and which of those things cause cancer and which ones don't. So technically, that means that I'm very, very skilled in the art of DNA sequencing. I can figure out the sequence of things that I didn't know what I was looking for. Um, and I'm also pretty good when I say I, I mean the people in my laboratory, you're not going to hear their names, but there's a group of people that do this excellent work. Um, we're really good at, at, um, detecting foreign pieces of DNA in places where they're not supposed to be, even if they're real low levels. And we use those skills during the pandemic. We invented the COVID test that many of you did a spit test. Okay. That came out of my lab.
because we were really good at that kind of stuff. The Pfizer vaccine is contaminated with plasma DNA. It's not just mRNA. It's got bits of DNA in it. This DNA is the DNA vector that was used as the template for the in vitro transcription reaction when they made the mRNA. I know this is true because I sequenced it in my own lab. The vials of Pfizer vaccine that were given out here in Columbia One of my colleagues was in charge of that vaccination program in the College of Pharmacy, and for reasons that I still don't understand, he kept every single vial. So he had a whole freezer full of the empty vials. Well, the empty vials have a little tiny bit in the bottom of them. He gave them all to me, and I looked at them. We had two batches that were given out here in Columbia, and I checked these two batches, and I checked them by sequencing. And I sequenced all the DNA that was in the vaccine, and I can see what's in there.
And it's surprising that there's any DNA in there. And you can kind of work out what it is and how it got there. And I'm kind of alarmed about the possible consequences of this, both in terms of human health and biology. But you should be alarmed about the regulatory process that allowed it to get there. So this DNA, in my view, it could be causing some of the rare but serious side effects like death from cardiac arrest. There's a lot of cases now. of people having suspicious death after vaccine. It's hard to prove what caused it. It's just, you know, temporally associated. And this DNA is a plausible mechanism, okay? This DNA can and likely will integrate into the genomic DNA of cells that got transfected with the vaccine mix. This is just the way it works. We do this in the lab all the time.
We take pieces of DNA, we mix them up with a lipid complex like the Pfizer vaccine is in, we pour it onto cells and a lot of it gets into the cells and a lot of it gets into the DNA of those cells and it becomes a permanent fixture of the cell. It's not just a temporary thing, it is in that cell and all of its progeny from now on forevermore, amen. So that's why I'm kind of alarmed about this DNA being in the vaccine. It's different from RNA because it can be permanent. This is a real hazard for genome modification of long-lived somatic cells, like stem cells. And it could cause, theoretically, this is all a theoretical concern, but it's pretty reasonable based on solid molecular biology, that it could cause a sustained autoimmune attack toward that tissue. It's also a very real theoretical risk of future cancer.
The autoimmunity thing is not my wheelhouse. I'm not an immunologist, but the cancer risk is. That's my bag. I know that.

゚viralシfypシ゚viralシalシ゚viralシfypシ゚viralシ゚viralシfypシ゚viralシalシfollowers

12/11/2025

#1 Disturbing Study Reveals mRNA Injections 'Poisoned' the World

This clip maximizes impact by using the entire available transcript, covering the broad scope of the alleged global poisoning, detailing the shocking findings about gene dysregulation and cancer, and concluding with the strong claim that this was a 'biological attack.'
have been injected into over 80% of Americans, about 70% of the global population, and it has poisoned the vast majority of the world, their entire body. So we go through all organ systems, including the brain, it reaches there, reaches the heart, it reaches the bone marrow, it causes cancer, it basically destroys the entire body. But what's most shocking is we actually just released a study. It's absolutely disturbing what we uncovered. We actually looked at the genetic profiles of those who received mRNA injections and developed cancer or new onset adverse events, and we found that thousands of gene expressions were dysregulated, and the genes involved cancer control and cancer suppression genes, so those were being screwed up. resulting in these cancers, as well as immune collapse. So many of these genes have to do with proper immune function, as well as mitochondrial failure. The mitochondrial electron transport chain is not functioning optimally anymore in the injected. And so, yeah, this was a biological attack on humanity.

゚viralシfypシ゚viralシalシ゚viralシfypシ゚viralシ゚viralシfypシ゚viralシalシfollowers

12/10/2025

#40 Why you should stop chasing positivity and embrace uncomfortable truths

This clip offers a philosophical defense of discussing difficult, negative topics (like AI safety), arguing that positivity should not preclude facing uncomfortable truths necessary for real progress and awareness.
I don't know if they feel good or bad, but people find it interesting. It's one of those topics where I can have a conversation about different cures for cancer with an average person. But everyone has opinions about AI. Everyone has opinions about simulation. It's interesting that you don't have to be highly educated or a genius to understand those concepts. Because I tend to think that it makes me feel not positive. And I understand that, but I've always been of the opinion that you shouldn't live in a world of delusion where you're just seeking to be positive, have sort of positive things said and avoid uncomfortable conversations. Actually progress often in my life comes from like having uncomfortable conversations, becoming aware about something and then at least being informed about how I can do something about it. And so I think that's why, that's why I asked the question. Cause I assume most people will, should, if they're, you know, if they're normal human beings, um, listen to these conversations and go, gosh, that's scary. And this is concerning. And then I keep coming back to this point, which is like, what do I do with that energy? Yeah, but I'm trying to point out, this is not different than so many conversations. We can talk about, oh, there is starvation in this region, genocide in this region, you're dying, cancer is spreading, autism is up. You can always find something to be very depressed about and nothing you can do about it. And we are very good at concentrating on what we can change, what we are good at, and basically not trying to embrace the whole world as a local environment.

゚viralシfypシ゚viralシalシ゚viralシfypシ゚viralシ゚viralシfypシ゚viralシalシfollowers

12/10/2025

#39 In 2030, even PLUMBERS will be replaced by robots. The end of human labor.

Focuses on a tangible date (2030) and uses a common 'safe' job—plumbing—to illustrate the reality of physical automation via advanced humanoid robots. High stakes, specific prediction.
Which is 2030. What's your prediction for 2030? What will the world look like? So we probably will have a humanoid robots with enough flexibility dexterity to compete with humans in all domains, including plumbers. We can make artificial plumbers. Not the plumbers where that was, that felt like the last bastion of human employment. So 2030, five years from now, humanoid robots, so many of the companies, the leading companies, including Tesla, are developing humanoid robots at light speed, and they're getting increasingly more effective. These humanoid robots will be able to move through physical space, make an omelet, do anything humans can do, but obviously be connected to AI as well. So they can think, talk. Right. They're controlled by AI. They're always connected to the network. They are already dominating in many ways. Our world will look remarkably different when humanoid robots are functional and effective, because that's really when, you know, I started to cry. Like the combination of intelligence and physical ability really doesn't leave much, does it, for us human beings? Not much. So today, if you have intelligence through internet, you can hire humans to do your bidding for you. You can pay them in Bitcoin. So you can have bodies just not directly controlling them. So it's not a huge game changer to add direct control of physical bodies. Intelligence is where it's at. The important component is definitely higher ability to optimize, to solve problems, to find patterns people cannot see.

゚viralシfypシ゚viralシalシ゚viralシfypシ゚viralシ゚viralシfypシ゚viralシalシfollowers

12/10/2025

#38 Why The Creators Of Our Simulation Have Terrible Morals

A provocative clip where the speaker explicitly judges the 'simulators' based on the reality of suffering, using the severe example of torturing children to question their moral framework. The follow-up discussion on human ethics boards provides excellent contrast.
So clearly brilliant engineer, brilliant scientist, brilliant artist, not so good with morals and ethics. Room for improvement. In our view of what morals and ethics should be. Well, we know that is suffering in a world. So unless you think it's ethical to torture children, then I'm questioning your approach. But in terms of incentives, to create a positive incentive, you probably also need to create negative incentives. Suffering seems to be one of the negative incentives built into our design to stop me doing things I shouldn't do. So like put my hand in a fire, it's going to hurt. But it's all about levels, levels of suffering, right? So unpleasant stimuli, negative feedback doesn't have to be at like negative infinity hell levels. You don't want to burn alive and feel it. You want to be like, oh, this is uncomfortable. I'm going to stop. It's interesting because we assume that they don't have great morals and ethics, but we too would, we take animals and cook them and eat them for dinner. And we also conduct experiments on mice and rats. But to get university approval to conduct an experiment, you submit a proposal and there is a panel of ethicists who would say, you can't experiment on humans. You can't burn babies. You can't eat animals alive. All those things would be banned. In most parts of the world. Where they have ethical boards. Some places don't bother with it, so they have easier approval process. It's funny when you talk about the simulation theory, there's an element of the conversation that makes life feel less meaningful in a weird way.

゚viralシfypシ゚viralシalシ゚viralシfypシ゚viralシ゚viralシfypシ゚viralシalシfollowers

12/10/2025

#37 Eventually, a guy on a laptop can build Superintelligence

Explores the decreasing cost curve of AI development, predicting a future where AGI is affordable enough for individuals ('a guy on a laptop') to build it, making regulation and control nearly impossible.
Is this technology different than, say, nuclear weapons, which require a huge amount of investment and you have to enrich the uranium and you need billions of dollars, potentially, to even build a nuclear weapon? But it feels like this technology is much cheaper to get to superintelligence, potentially, or at least it will become cheaper. I wonder if it's possible that some guy, some startup, is going to be able to build superintelligence in a couple of years without the need of it. billions of dollars of compute or electricity power. That's a great point. So every year it becomes cheaper and cheaper to train a sufficiently large model. If today it would take a trillion dollars to build superintelligence, next year it could be a hundred billion and so on. At some point, a guy on a laptop could do it. But you don't want to wait four years to make it affordable. So that's why so much money is pouring in. Somebody wants to get there this year and lucky in all the winnings, light cone level. So in that regard, they both very expensive projects like Manhattan level projects, which was the nuclear bomb projects. The difference between the two technologies is that nuclear weapons are still tools. Some dictators, some countries, someone has to decide to use them, deploy them. Whereas super intelligence is not, it's not a tool. It's an agent. It makes its own decisions and no one is controlling it. So that's a fundamental difference to me. But if you're saying that it is going to get incrementally cheaper, like I think it's Moore's law, isn't it? That technology gets cheaper. Then there is a future where some guy on his laptop is going to be able to create super intelligence without oversight or regulation or employees, et cetera. Yeah. That's why a lot of people suggesting we need to build something like, um, surveillance planet.

゚viralシfypシ゚viralシalシ゚viralシfypシ゚viralシ゚viralシfypシ゚viralシalシfollowers

MOB Revelation

03/17/2026

02/23/2026

02/19/2026

02/19/2026

12/11/2025

12/10/2025

12/10/2025

12/10/2025

12/10/2025

Address

Website

Alerts

Contact The Business

Shortcuts

Share

Category